Our services in the selected country:
  • No services available for your region.
Select Country:
Remember my selection
Your browser is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites

March 09, 2017 | GSAM Connect

Four Things to Know about Emerging Market Corporate Debt


Note: Separate multiple email address with a comma or semicolon.

Send me a copy


Note: Separate multiple email address with a comma or semicolon.

Your Name:

Your Email Address:

Send me a copy

Renewed investment inflows and rising performance are the dominant early 2017 trends in emerging markets (EM). This represents a dramatic turnaround from the outflows, volatility, and protectionist fears of the post-US election period. We believe investors should look beyond the headlines and toward the long term when it comes to investing across EM – here are four reasons we are positive on EM’s oft-overlooked corporate debt segment.

1. The growth of EM corporate debt is a story of rising investor confidence. Emerging market debt (EMD) today is an investment universe of more than $3.5 trillion, having grown into a major asset class spanning hard and soft currencies, as well as the government and private sectors. Corporate debt, most of which is dollar-denominated, now accounts for almost a quarter of this universe.¹ We would attribute EM corporate debt’s rise (see Exhibit 1) to robust investor demand, rapid long-term EM economic growth, and increasing integration into global capital markets. To us, the fact that demand has kept pace with brisk supply is a sign of investor confidence in the quality of EM corporate debt markets.

2. The yield premium persists. EM corporate debt has offered higher yield over similarly rated developed market (DM) corporates.2 Higher yields are in part a reflection of the higher risk premium investors typically require when investing in EM. But we think investor perception of risk in emerging markets is changing. Corporate governance is improving in private markets and macro policy across the EM universe is becoming more orthodox. Meanwhile, events in Europe and the US have demonstrated that political risk exists in the developed world, too.

At the company level, we see improving fundamentals, as reflected by trends of consolidating leverage and conservative capital expenditure, both of which are positive for credit quality. From a technical point of view, we see a supportive supply outlook in 2017, with relatively subdued net issuance for EM corporates, with the likely exception of China, where we continue to observe a buildup in corporate sector leverage.

3. Security selection matters in emerging market debt. The EM corporate universe includes over 540 issuers across more than 50 countries.3 We see opportunities for skilled security selection arising more frequently when compared to developed markets, in part because the EM corporate sector receives less coverage by research analysts. We believe rigorous fundamental research can help identify idiosyncratic opportunities where return potential adequately compensates for the associated risk, while foregoing areas of undue credit risk. We also see a need to examine macro and credit conditions in individual EM countries. EM is no monolithic bloc. We think active managers can add alpha by understanding each country's position in the economic cycle and identifying sovereign tail risks which may impact the corporate sector.



Source: J.P.Morgan index data as of December 31, 2016.
EM External Corporate Debt reflects the JPM Corporate Emerging Market Bond Index Broad (CEMBI)
EM External Sovereign Debt reflects the JPM Emerging Market Bond Index Global (EMBIG)

4. EM corporate debt can help diversify existing corporate credit and/or traditional fixed income allocations, or be used as a complement for existing EM investments. Credit cycles across emerging markets are at varying stages and offer a wide spectrum of opportunities. By contrast, the US credit cycle is at a later stage. We believe EM corporate debt offers investors the opportunity to lend to companies that may benefit from an expanding middle class, which could be one means of diversifying DM corporate credit allocations. EM corporate debt can also be used as a diversifier due to low historical correlations with traditional fixed income (for instance the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Bond index). When compared with EM sovereign debt, the sector typically has a lower duration but higher credit quality, and in our view can serve as an attractive extension to existing EM allocations.

Stay posted on the latest market developments and key themes for your portfolios and practices.
Get Connected

About the Author

Angus Bell

Angus Bell

Portfolio Manager, Global Fixed Income, Goldman Sachs Asset Management

Related Insights

January 2018 | GSAM Connect
2018 EM Equity Outlook

In 2017, Emerging Market Equities have returned +37%, significantly outperforming US and Developed Market Equities, which returned +21% and +22% respectively – this marks the strongest absolute and relative performance in eight years. Looking to 2018, we believe Emerging Markets could be in the early stages of a multi-year recovery underpinned by 1) growth acceleration 2) earnings revival and 3) attractive valuations.

February 15, 2017 | GSAM Connect
Equities Under Trump: Why We Expect a Volatile Ride (Higher)

We continue to expect moderately positive 2017 US equity returns, but the journey could be a turbulent one.

February 2017 | Macro Insights
Trade Showdown

Globalization has shaped our world, owing in large part to the expansion of cross-border trade. This Macro Insights explores the “Globalism to Populism” transition, and we've asked our investment professionals to share their views on the market and investment implications of evolving trade policy, as protectionism could reconfigure trade relationships globally and plot a new distribution of winners and losers.

Contact Us

For More Information
Online Request