December 15, 2022 | 14 Minute Read
Co-Chief Investment Officer, Multi-Asset Solutions
The world as we know it is changing. The shape of the global economy and the policy prescriptions necessary to address post-pandemic challenges are likely to be different than they were in decades past. In the last issue of Asset Management Perspectives, we examined the world at an inflection point and identified five key structural developments that we believe will spark profound change: Deglobalization, Digitization, Decarbonization, Destabilization, and Demographics.
The unrelenting rise in energy and food prices and a reordering of economic and political alliances have accelerated some of these trends. Geopolitical shifts are putting issues such as supply chain resilience and greater economic self-sufficiency in particularly sharp focus and will likely accelerate a process of partial deglobalization. Destabilization is underway, changing bilateral relationships, and the rise of conflict is likely to shake up trade patterns and reorder alliances. We believe these developments will also affect the speed and scope of decarbonization efforts, while demographics and increased digitization will continue to influence the ways in which policymakers tackle key economic challenges, including inflation. But these three Ds are likely to take longer to play out.
Even so, the changes we’re starting to see make for an unfamiliar investment environment. The decade of low inflation, low interest rates and minimal market volatility appears to be over. Today, risk management is increasingly important while pattern recognition may be of limited value. We don’t yet know the precise impact this will have on industrial policy, trade, or monetary and fiscal policy, but we believe a changing world order will affect regions differently. For investors, we believe seizing the opportunities these changes may create while bolstering portfolios against market turbulence calls for a new approach rooted in a more holistic view of asset allocation with increased attention to risk.
COVID-19 revealed a few things about globalization. First, it showed just how highly interdependent countries have become as a result of unfettered free trade. The economic specialization and globalized supply chains were deflationary, but the regional specialization that came with them also made countries more vulnerable to economic shocks. When the pandemic shut down global production and trade in 2020, whole economies were nearly paralyzed. Basic goods were missing from shelves and showrooms as supply-chain disruptions created shortages across industries, including automobiles, semiconductors, and apparel, to name a few. At the same time, policymakers sought to ease the impact of economic shutdowns by injecting massive monetary and fiscal stimuli into the system, causing inflation to surge. The outbreak of war between Ukraine and Russia, a key supplier of oil and natural gas to Europe, added fuel to the fire.
At the same time, strained relations between the United States and China appear to have encouraged both to strive for more self-sufficiency in key industries. This is likely, in our view, to lead to more centralized economic policies where state intervention plays an important role, either directly or indirectly, through incentives and disincentives to decision makers and businesses.
In the US, the Biden Administration has passed major bills on infrastructure, semiconductors and the environment in which the state is poised to play a central role. This involves using tax incentives and subsidies to support domestic industries, notably the companies that produce the microchips necessary for advanced semiconductor technology, and restricting exports of advanced computing and semiconductors to China. The embrace of a more muscular industrial policy marks a stark shift from decades past, when US politicians and business leaders were often among the most vocal supporters of laissez-faire capitalism and globalization.
China, too, has signaled its intent to accelerate changes to a development model that for many years cast it as the world’s factory. In the 20th Party Congress Report, President Xi Jinping stressed the need to prioritize “high-quality development” to modernize the economy. Perhaps recognizing the perils of over-specialization, such as the reliance on low-valued-added exports to the US and Europe, China’s leadership said it also intends to continue redirecting strategic economic policy away from generic manufacturing and toward new development with a focus on technological innovation, food and energy self-sufficiency, and supply chain security.
Add to that the US move to ban the transfer of advanced semiconductor technology to China, which may prompt Chinese leaders to ramp up state-directed investment in domestic chip producers and bolster onshore manufacturing. Such a move could intensify the race between the two countries for dominance in the tech sector.
Europe saw more specialization than other parts of the world following the introduction of the euro two decades ago. The common currency and open borders facilitated a perfect flow of goods and services, capital and labor. But the lack of a common fiscal policy has created problems, as illustrated by divergent growth rates within the euro area and the developing energy crisis. During the European debt crisis a decade ago, the epicenter was firmly located in the south. The current energy crisis is having a more severe effect on the industrialized—and colder—northern countries. Germany and others that are heavily dependent on Russian oil and gas imports favor a common European Union response to support them as they struggle with soaring energy costs. Others with warmer climates and less dependence on imported energy, including France and Italy, do not. Time will tell if the current external shocks lead to a closer fiscal integration of the currency area or more divergence.
Source: Eurostat, Goldman Sachs Asset Management.
As prices have continued to rise in much of the world and external shocks threatened to destabilize economic dynamics, there is also a case to be made for increased coordination between fiscal and monetary policies to better affect outcomes. At times like these, fiscal and monetary policy can be complementary; using both can potentially be more effective while helping to limit unintended consequences. This is especially so in Europe, where the European Central Bank (ECB) must set an appropriate interest rate policy for 19 different countries despite vast national differences in the structures of member states’ respective economies, budget deficits, economic growth rates and debt-to-GDP ratios. For instance, Italy, the third largest economy in the euro zone, has a debt-to-GDP ratio of 150% and significant amount of debt coming due in the years ahead, making it particularly vulnerable to higher interest rates.
Some degree of targeted coordination between fiscal and monetary policy may also be relevant in the US, where a downward shift in inflation is dependent on the state of the labor market. So far, the Federal Reserve (Fed) is leading the charge against inflation with an aggressive tightening campaign. But monetary policy is a fairly blunt tool, and fiscal measures may have more influence over specific segments of the market. Without some policy coordination, the Fed’s monetary tightening process could inadvertently inflict damage on parts of the labor market, worsening income inequalities and regional growth disparities. Careful fiscal policies may help to temper such undesirable outcomes.
A byproduct of a world that is becoming more regionalized and increasingly polarized may turn out to be a new wave of re-industrialization in which fiscal policy and government interventions provide incentives to invest in certain sectors. This may act as a silver lining for countries that had swung too far toward specialization, a process that created country-specific and regional economic vulnerabilities and amplified income inequalities. Developed countries in particular have experienced a massive shift from manufacturing to services in recent decades, and we suspect today’s geopolitical developments and external shocks are likely to rekindle the argument for producing closer to the consumer, as technology, automation and robotics reduce the cost of labor and its contribution to the production process. This is likely to weaken companies’ incentive to outsource. A shift of this type—from unfettered free trade to what might be described as strategically optimal trade—may be more in line with the changing geopolitical landscape and can have important economic implications.
A key one is making economies more resilient to external shocks. Overconcentration in one industry can hurt a country’s industrial diversity, making it less able to withstand external shocks and weather recessions. This became evident during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) from 2007-2009, especially in certain European countries. By contrast, the US was able to bounce back from the financial crisis faster, due to its largely diversified economy and limited dependence on external trade.
When we measure countries by their Economic Complexity Index (ECI)—an indicator developed by MIT and Harvard economists that captures industrial composition and information about export diversity—we see that improvements in a country’s complexity tend to correlate with higher GDP per capita. As an example, China’s GDP per capita and its ECI more than doubled between 2000 and 2020.1 It’s possible that a gradual shift from free to strategically optimal trade in the decades ahead may yield similar benefits for countries that diversify their economic structures, leading them to see increased resilience to external shocks and, eventually, reduced income disparities due to more broad-based growth, increased fiscal transfer or a combination of both.
Increased geopolitical tensions are also partly behind deglobalization, and they are accelerating destabilization of the geopolitical order. In many cases, we expect them to change trade patterns and alliances. In particular, we believe that control of commodities beyond energy will be an important determinant of political alliances and a source of economic and geopolitical influence. As the war in Ukraine has demonstrated, many of the countries that did not vocally criticize Russia for invading its neighbor exercise significant control over the global supply of important commodities. Saudi Arabia, like Russia, is a dominant global supplier of oil but has typically been a US ally. That did not stop it from joining with Russia in late 2022 to lead the OPEC+ oil cartel to cut production by two million barrels. US officials responded by pledging to reevaluate the country’s relationship with Saudi Arabia.
China also plays an outsized role when it comes to key commodities. It is the world’s top producer of aluminum, a key commodity necessary for the production of goods ranging from cars to iPhones. Any disruptions to aluminum supply would have repercussions for the supply of copper and other metals, which can lead to increased global uncertainty about inflation, trade and economic growth. China and Russia together are also key sources of copper, zinc and nickel—minerals necessary for the eventual transition to green energy. Wind power generation, for example, requires six times more of these commodities than a coal-fired power plant and 13 times more than a gas plant. Russia is also a major producer of wheat and, along with China, a top exporter of fertilizers.2
Other governments around the world—especially those in major developed countries—are likely to attempt to diversify their commodity suppliers for energy sources, metals, minerals, and grains. In the US, the Biden Administration has moved to expand domestic mining of many of the key minerals needed for green energy and invested in refining key battery materials such as lithium, cobalt and nickel.3 Such investment is welcome, but it is not, in our view, likely to enable the world to wean itself off fossil fuels completely and quickly. Countries may lack the ability to store green energy at sufficient scale for some time to come and will likely need to strike a balance between fossil fuels and alternative energy sources for the foreseeable future. Nuclear power may resurface as a clean energy supply option as well, though the risks associated with it may act as an impediment in some countries.
Over the long run, the trend toward green energy is likely to continue largely in line with the de-carbonization theme we highlighted in the past. Battery storage, which is crucial to solving the intermittency issues associated with wind and solar power, is becoming more competitive, and we expect investment in that space to continue the trend. But nearer term, geopolitical developments may delay the transition. Some of the delay can be chalked up to years of structural underinvestment in oil and gas production that left the US and Europe without a clear and reliable transition policy from fossil fuel to green energy. The war in Ukraine has since forced many countries to shift gears and ensure access to energy in the short run, irrespective of source or type, to meet immediate needs. China has invested heavily over the last year in electricity-generating coal capacity that will amount to three times more than the rest of the world combined.4 These developments are likely to keep energy prices elevated in the short- to medium-term.
Oil and other commodities, of course, tend to be denominated in dollars, which puts additional pressure on the budgets of countries that have seen their currencies depreciate sharply against US currency. An increasing dearth of safe-haven assets that are sufficiently liquid to address global needs presents further challenges. US Treasuries continue to be the asset investors primarily turn to for relative safety and risk reduction, and this also sustains the global demand for US dollars. At the same time, the Fed’s aggressive monetary tightening makes it more difficult for countries, such as Argentina and Turkey, that have significant USD-denominated debt to service.
Source: Institute of International Finance; as of Q2 2022
Dollar strength is a challenge for developed markets as well. Should the euro, yen and pound sterling continue to weaken significantly from here, central banks may have to intervene by selling dollars to restore exchange rate stability and help them counter inflation. Japan’s limited recent interventions in 2022 have had minimal effect in stabilizing the yen. A further depreciation may conceivably lead the Bank of Japan (BOJ) to abandon its Yield Curve Control policy, especially if inflation significantly overshoots the BOJ’s 2% target. That could result in a sudden selloff in dollars with possible repercussions for global financial markets.
If some or all of these risks play out, a financial crisis could become more likely. Reduced liquidity in the financial system—partly the result of higher capital requirements for banks that were put in place after the GFC—could amplify the severity of any crisis, particularly for financial firms that operate outside the traditional banking system. A surge in Gilt yields after the UK government announced unfunded tax cuts earlier this year sparked a liquidity squeeze among UK pension funds that required emergency bond purchases by the Bank of England to restore stability. And a rapid rise in US Treasury yields would have broader implications, given the dollar’s global role.
This underscores the need for risk management, which many investors were able to de-emphasize over the last decade when rates and volatility were low and liquidity was plentiful. It’s also important to note that interest rates are higher today than they were when the GFC hit and are still rising, suggesting it may take less to generate stress.
The era of low-to-zero interest rates required significant portfolio leverage to generate target returns. That is less necessary today; even high-quality government bonds are offering attractive yields for the first time in decades. We expect return potential across asset classes to remain elevated as rates settle at a higher equilibrium level, which reduces the need to employ high degrees of leverage. Those with sufficient dry powder may find opportunities to buy quality assets at attractive valuations when over-leveraged investors are forced to sell.
For investors who can adapt and remain flexible, today’s challenges and change bring potential opportunity across sectors and regions. Geopolitical unrest, tighter financial conditions, more centralized economic policy—all will likely provoke more dispersion across asset classes sectors and regions and between developed-world and emerging-market assets. For instance, the volatility of broad equity indices masks the vast dispersion of outcomes within them, providing a ripe environment for stock selection in public markets as volatility subsides. These opportunities may transcend the usual categorizations of value and growth or particular industries and instead be rooted in companies with effective operations and healthy balance sheets, regardless of sector or style. Adding private market allocations to the mix can provide even greater diversification, as ownership structures and deal terms typically give investors the ability to take a more active role in operations.
These are challenging times in the markets. But the tectonic shifts that are altering the shape and structure of the global economy are also creating a new and vibrant investment landscape. As risk reprices, we believe careful and informed investors will have unique opportunities to reshape their portfolios and capitalize on new opportunities.
Committed to providing you with the insights you need to build your practice.
1 Economic Complexity Index (ECI) vs GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) (2000) Retrieved from https://oec.world/en/visualize/scatter/hs92/OEC.ECI/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD/all/all/2000
2 US Department of the Interior, Absolute Strategy Research, United Nations
3 The White House, FACT SHEET: Securing a Made in America Supply Chain for Critical Minerals. As of February 22, 2022
4 Reuters, China starts building 33 GW of coal power in 2021, most since 2016 –research. As of February 23, 2022
Risk Assets are those with a high degree of risk and volatility, such as such as equities, high-yield credit, commodities and currencies.
Dry powder refers to marketable securities that are highly liquid and considered cash-like.
GDP is Gross Domestic Product
Green energy includes energy types generated from natural resources, such as sunlight, wind or water.
Laissez-faire capitalism is an economic philosophy of free-market capitalism that opposes government intervention.
OPEC is the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) is a method to compare different countries' currencies through a "basket of goods" approach.
All investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
Equity securities are more volatile than bonds and subject to greater risks.
Bonds are subject to interest rate, price and credit risks. Prices tend to be inversely affected by changes in interest rates. Typically, when interest rates rise, there is a corresponding decline in the market value of bonds.
Investments in foreign securities entail special risks such as currency, political, economic, and market risks. These risks are heightened in emerging markets.
Investments in commodities may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity.
Private equity investments are speculative, highly illiquid, involve a high degree of risk, have high fees and expenses that could reduce returns, and subject to the possibility of partial or total loss of fund capital; they are, therefore, intended for experienced and sophisticated long-term investors who can accept such risks.
Hedge funds and other private investment funds (collectively, “Alternative Investments”) are subject to less regulation than other types of pooled investment vehicles such as mutual funds. Alternative Investments may impose significant fees, including incentive fees that are based upon a percentage of the realized and unrealized gains and an individual’s net returns may differ significantly from actual returns. Such fees may offset all or a significant portion of such Alternative Investment’s trading profits. Alternative Investments are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information. Investors may have limited rights with respect to their investments, including limited voting rights and participation in the management of such Alternative Investments.
Alternative Investments often engage in leverage and other investment practices that are extremely speculative and involve a high degree of risk. Such practices may increase the volatility of performance and the risk of investment loss, including the loss of the entire amount that is invested. There may be conflicts of interest relating to the Alternative Investment and its service providers, including Goldman Sachs and its affiliates. Similarly, interests in an Alternative Investment are highly illiquid and generally are not transferable without the consent of the sponsor, and applicable securities and tax laws will limit transfers.
High-yield, lower-rated securities involve greater price volatility and present greater credit risks than higher-rated fixed income securities.
The currency market affords investors a substantial degree of leverage. This leverage presents the potential for substantial profits but also entails a high degree of risk including the risk that losses may be similarly substantial. Such transactions are considered suitable only for investors who are experienced in transactions of that kind. Currency fluctuations will also affect the value of an investment.
Diversification does not protect an investor from market risk and does not ensure a profit.
The views expressed herein are as December 13, 2022 and subject to change in the future. Individual portfolio management teams for Goldman Sachs Asset Management may have views and opinions and/or make investment decisions that, in certain instances, may not always be consistent with the views and opinions expressed herein.
Views and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation by Goldman Sachs Asset Management to buy, sell, or hold any security, they should not be construed as investment advice.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, which may vary. The value of investments and the income derived from investments will fluctuate and can go down as well as up. A loss of principal may occur.
THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE OR TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT WOULD BE UNAUTHORIZED OR UNLAWFUL TO DO SO.
Prospective investors should inform themselves as to any applicable legal requirements and taxation and exchange control regulations in the countries of their citizenship, residence or domicile which might be relevant.
This information discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends, or other broad-based economic, market or political conditions and should not be construed as research or investment advice. This material has been prepared by Goldman Sachs Asset Management and is not financial research nor a product of Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research (GIR). It was not prepared in compliance with applicable provisions of law designed to promote the independence of financial analysis and is not subject to a prohibition on trading following the distribution of financial research. The views and opinions expressed may differ from those of Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research or other departments or divisions of Goldman Sachs and its affiliates. Investors are urged to consult with their financial advisors before buying or selling any securities. This information may not be current and Goldman Sachs Asset Management has no obligation to provide any updates or changes.
Economic and market forecasts presented herein reflect a series of assumptions and judgments as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change without notice. These forecasts do not take into account the specific investment objectives, restrictions, tax and financial situation or other needs of any specific client. Actual data will vary and may not be reflected here. These forecasts are subject to high levels of uncertainty that may affect actual performance. Accordingly, these forecasts should be viewed as merely representative of a broad range of possible outcomes. These forecasts are estimated, based on assumptions, and are subject to significant revision and may change materially as economic and market conditions change. Goldman Sachs has no obligation to provide updates or changes to these forecasts. Case studies and examples are for illustrative purposes only.
Although certain information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or fairness. We have relied upon and assumed without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from public sources.
United Kingdom: In the United Kingdom, this material is a financial promotion and has been approved by Goldman Sachs Asset Management International, which is authorized and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority.
European Economic Area (EEA):This material is a financial promotion disseminated by Goldman Sachs Bank Europe SE, including through its authorised branches ("GSBE"). GSBE is a credit institution incorporated in Germany and, within the Single Supervisory Mechanism established between those Member States of the European Union whose official currency is the Euro, subject to direct prudential supervision by the European Central Bank and in other respects supervised by German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufischt, BaFin) and Deutsche Bundesbank.
Switzerland: For Qualified Investor use only – Not for distribution to general public. This is marketing material. This document is provided to you by Goldman Sachs Bank AG, Zürich. Any future contractual relationships will be entered into with affiliates of Goldman Sachs Bank AG, which are domiciled outside of Switzerland. We would like to remind you that foreign (Non-Swiss) legal and regulatory systems may not provide the same level of protection in relation to client confidentiality and data protection as offered to you by Swiss law.
Asia excluding Japan: Please note that neither Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited (“GSAMHK”) or Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Number: 201329851H ) (“GSAMS”) nor any other entities involved in the Goldman Sachs Asset Management business that provide this material and information maintain any licenses, authorizations or registrations in Asia (other than Japan), except that it conducts businesses (subject to applicable local regulations) in and from the following jurisdictions: Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, India and China. This material has been issued for use in or from Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited, in or from Singapore by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Number: 201329851H) and in or from Malaysia by Goldman Sachs (Malaysia) Sdn Berhad (880767W).
Australia: This material is distributed by Goldman Sachs Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd ABN 41 006 099 681, AFSL 228948 (‘GSAMA’) and is intended for viewing only by wholesale clients for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This document may not be distributed to retail clients in Australia (as that term is defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)) or to the general public. This document may not be reproduced or distributed to any person without the prior consent of GSAMA. To the extent that this document contains any statement which may be considered to be financial product advice in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that advice is intended to be given to the intended recipient of this document only, being a wholesale client for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Any advice provided in this document is provided by either of the following entities. They are exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence under the Corporations Act of Australia and therefore do not hold any Australian Financial Services Licences, and are regulated under their respective laws applicable to their jurisdictions, which differ from Australian laws. Any financial services given to any person by these entities by distributing this document in Australia are provided to such persons pursuant to the respective ASIC Class Orders and ASIC Instrument mentioned below.
No offer to acquire any interest in a fund or a financial product is being made to you in this document. If the interests or financial products do become available in the future, the offer may be arranged by GSAMA in accordance with section 911A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act. GSAMA holds Australian Financial Services Licence No. 228948. Any offer will only be made in circumstances where disclosure is not required under Part 6D.2 of the Corporations Act or a product disclosure statement is not required to be given under Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act (as relevant).
Canada: This presentation has been communicated in Canada by GSAM LP, which is registered as a portfolio manager under securities legislation in all provinces of Canada and as a commodity trading manager under the commodity futures legislation of Ontario and as a derivatives adviser under the derivatives legislation of Quebec. GSAM LP is not registered to provide investment advisory or portfolio management services in respect of exchange-traded futures or options contracts in Manitoba and is not offering to provide such investment advisory or portfolio management services in Manitoba by delivery of this material.
Japan: This material has been issued or approved in Japan for the use of professional investors defined in Article 2 paragraph (31) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law by Goldman Sachs Asset Management Co., Ltd.
South Africa: Goldman Sachs Asset Management International is authorised by the Financial Services Board of South Africa as a financial services provider.
Malaysia: This material is issued in or from Malaysia by Goldman Sachs (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (880767W)
Hong Kong: This material has been issued or approved for use in or from Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited.
Singapore: This material has been issued or approved for use in or from Singapore by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Number: 201329851H).
Bahrain: This material has not been reviewed by the Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB) and the CBB takes no responsibility for the accuracy of the statements or the information contained herein, or for the performance of the securities or related investment, nor shall the CBB have any liability to any person for damage or loss resulting from reliance on any statement or information contained herein. This material will not be issued, passed to, or made available to the public generally.
Kuwait: This material has not been approved for distribution in the State of Kuwait by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry or the Central Bank of Kuwait or any other relevant Kuwaiti government agency. The distribution of this material is, therefore, restricted in accordance with law no. 31 of 1990 and law no. 7 of 2010, as amended. No private or public offering of securities is being made in the State of Kuwait, and no agreement relating to the sale of any securities will be concluded in the State of Kuwait. No marketing, solicitation or inducement activities are being used to offer or market securities in the State of Kuwait.
Oman: The Capital Market Authority of the Sultanate of Oman (the "CMA") is not liable for the correctness or adequacy of information provided in this document or for identifying whether or not the services contemplated within this document are appropriate investment for a potential investor. The CMA shall also not be liable for any damage or loss resulting from reliance placed on the document.
Qatar This document has not been, and will not be, registered with or reviewed or approved by the Qatar Financial Markets Authority, the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority or Qatar Central Bank and may not be publicly distributed. It is not for general circulation in the State of Qatar and may not be reproduced or used for any other purpose.
Saudi Arabia: The Capital Market Authority does not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of this document, and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from, or incurred in reliance upon, any part of this document. If you do not understand the contents of this document you should consult an authorised financial adviser.
The CMA does not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of these materials, and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from, or incurred in reliance upon, any part of these materials. If you do not understand the contents of these materials, you should consult an authorised financial adviser.
United Arab Emirates: This document has not been approved by, or filed with the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or the Securities and Commodities Authority. If you do not understand the contents of this document, you should consult with a financial advisor.
Israel: This document has not been, and will not be, registered with or reviewed or approved by the Israel Securities Authority (ISA”). It is not for general circulation in Israel and may not be reproduced or used for any other purpose. Goldman Sachs Asset Management International is not licensed to provide investment advisory or management services in Israel.
Jordan: The document has not been presented to, or approved by, the Jordanian Securities Commission or the Board for Regulating Transactions in Foreign Exchanges.
Colombia: Esta presentación no tiene el propósito o el efecto de iniciar, directa o indirectamente, la adquisición de un producto a prestación de un servicio por parte de Goldman Sachs Asset Management a residentes colombianos. Los productos y/o servicios de Goldman Sachs Asset Management no podrán ser ofrecidos ni promocionados en Colombia o a residentes Colombianos a menos que dicha oferta y promoción se lleve a cabo en cumplimiento del Decreto 2555 de 2010 y las otras reglas y regulaciones aplicables en materia de promoción de productos y/o servicios financieros y /o del mercado de valores en Colombia o a residentes colombianos. Al recibir esta presentación, y en caso que se decida contactar a Goldman Sachs Asset Management, cada destinatario residente en Colombia reconoce y acepta que ha contactado a Goldman Sachs Asset Management por su propia iniciativa y no como resultado de cualquier promoción o publicidad por parte de Goldman Sachs Asset Management o cualquiera de sus agentes o representantes. Los residentes colombianos reconocen que (1) la recepción de esta presentación no constituye una solicitud de los productos y/o servicios de Goldman Sachs Asset Management, y (2) que no están recibiendo ninguna oferta o promoción directa o indirecta de productos y/o servicios financieros y/o del mercado de valores por parte de Goldman Sachs Asset Management.
Esta presentación es estrictamente privada y confidencial, y no podrá ser reproducida o utilizada para cualquier propósito diferente a la evaluación de una inversión potencial en los productos de Goldman Sachs Asset Management o la contratación de sus servicios por parte del destinatario de esta presentación, no podrá ser proporcionada a una persona diferente del destinatario de esta presentación.
Date of First Use: December 15, 2022 299506-OTU-1707632