Menu Our services in the selected location:
  • No services available for your region.
Select Location:
Remember my selection
We have been made aware that there are external parties falsely claiming to carry out financial services on behalf of Goldman Sachs (including Goldman Sachs Asset Management International and Goldman Sachs International) in order to market fake investment products and to solicit monetary payments. These external parties may pose as Goldman Sachs through the use of fraudulent communications via email, instant messaging or phone, as well as through the use of fake brochures and other documents containing Goldman Sachs branding and logos.
The Financial Conduct Authority of UK has issued warnings about these fraudulent activities which can be found here and here.
It is important to know that any communication you receive from Goldman Sachs would only come from an e-mail address and/or be found on the website. Further information regarding how you can protect yourself from fraudulent activity online and how you can contact us about this can be found on the Goldman Sachs Security page, available here.
Your browser is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites

October 2019 | GSAM Connect

Finding Alternatives in Today’s Market

Against the backdrop of a potential for recession, flare-ups of market volatility, and political shocks, we believe alternatives may help investors generate additional sources of return, and reduce volatility. In an in-depth interview, the GSAM Quantitative Investment Strategies Portfolio Management team discusses how alternatives may help investors navigate today's markets.

Q: What can investors do to navigate potential volatility?

We believe that alternative investments, both private placements as well as alternatives in liquid form, are an incredibly useful tool for smoothing out the ride so that clients can ultimately stay in their seats during bouts of volatility. A big reason why alternatives are such a useful tool is because of how they behave when equities and fixed income face challenging environments.

Since 1990, alternatives, as measured by the Hedge Fund Research Fund of Funds Index (HFRI FoF), have outperformed equities by 18% on average during periods of bear markets or large drawdowns. Additionally, alternative investments have outperformed core fixed income during periods of rising interest rates by 11% on average. Historically, alternatives have demonstrated the ability to provide a source of outperformance versus either stocks or bonds 57% of the time.

Source: HFR, Bloomberg, GSAM. Time period shown is longest common index inception (HFRIFOF inception 01/01/1990) through 31/03/2019. Rising rate periods are periods in which rates went up by more than 100 bps. Bear markets are defined as pullbacks of -10% or more. Challenging environments are equity bear markets and rising rate periods. MSCI World Index is shown net of international withholding taxes. GROWTH OF $100: A graphical measurement of a portfolio's gross return that simulates the performance of an initial investment of $100 over the given time period. The example provided does not reflect the deduction of investment advisory fees which would reduce an investor's return. Please be advised that since this example is calculated gross of fees the compounding effect of an investment manager's fees are not taken into consideration and the deduction of such fees would have a significant impact on the returns the greater the time period and as such the value of the $100, if calculated on a net basis, would be significantly lower than shown in this example. Past performance does not guarantee future results, which may vary. Source: GSAM.

Q: Can you discuss hedge fund performance during the 2018 market backdrop and the 2019 rally?

In 2018, the MSCI World was down about 8.7%. That was an environment when hedge funds, measured by the HFRI Fund Weighted Index, were only down 4.8%, which provided a nice cushion compared to global equities.

In comparison, hedge funds were up 8.4% through November 2019 while global equities were up 24.0%. However, it is crucial for us to also take a deeper dive into the more volatile times this year, which were May and August in particular.

In May 2019, global equity markets dropped 5.8%. Hedge funds on the other hand were down less than 2%, which provided a nice cushion. A similar situation occurred in August 2019, when global equities lost 2.1% while hedge funds were down 78 basis points. The Macro category generated positive, diversifying returns over both months, partially offsetting losses.

Those challenging periods demonstrate that alternatives have actually been able to provide some protection over just investing in equities during volatile times.

Q: Can you talk about your recent observations on hedge fund performance across different categories?

In the YTD as of November 2019, all four categories of hedge fund investing realised positive returns.

The Equity Long/Short category was the best performer, gaining more than 11%, driven most notably by growth strategies. Relative Value was up more than 7%, with steady, low volatility performance throughout the year. Event Driven gained roughly 6%, on the back of robust corporate actions, with little volatility and a stable credit market. Similarly, Macro gained roughly 6%, benefitting from long positions in government bonds in the first half of the year, followed by long exposures to global equities in the fourth quarter, though some of the gains in fixed income were given back as rates generally rose during the equity rally.

Q: Can you share some of the research that you’ve done on individual manager persistence?

We conducted a long-term persistence study spanning data from 2003 to 2016, and looked at the top 20% of hedge fund performers in any given year and measured where they were likely to rank in the following year. Less than a third of these top quintile performers in one year are likely to repeat a position in the top 20% just one year later. Additionally, almost a fifth of the top performers in one year are likely to end up in the bottom quintile in the next year instead.

If we focus on the more volatile environment of 2018 and 2019 YTD, the numbers are even more pronounced. Only 10% of fund managers were able to repeat in the top 20% for 2019 YTD, with a fifth of the funds ending up in the bottom 20% instead.

Overall, as these examples suggest, our findings indicate little evidence of performance persistence over time.

Q: Can you share how you think about investing in your alternatives program?

We take a diversified and varied approach to deliver hedge fund-like returns without directly investing in hedge funds.

We do not invest in any hedge funds or external managers directly, instead we employ a wide range of liquid instruments, spanning for example single name equities, ETFs, futures, FX forwards, and others.

We are looking to provide exposure to all the four main hedge fund styles: Equity Long Short, Macro, Relative Value and Event Driven.

We invest in a diversified bundle of liquid hedge fund market exposures and trading strategies by using our knowledge of the hedge fund industry and our data sources and technology. Our hedge fund knowledge comprises many individuals that have worked at hedge funds, have closely interacted with hedge funds or have been engaged in trading activities. This expertise and knowledge put us in a position to really get to the bottom of the systematic drivers of hedge fund returns. We then complement these fundamental insights with a range of data sources, including hedge fund return databases, prime brokerage reports, hedge fund consultants or public hedge fund filings such as 13-F.

[1] Source: Bloomberg. Indices referenced are US: S&P 500; Global Equities: MSCI World Index; Including Emerging Markets: MSCI ACWI Index

Stay posted on the latest market developments and key themes for your portfolios and practices.
Get Connected


September 2019 | Market Know-How
Easy Does It

We see current conditions as largely benign as long as investors understand that risk may no longer be linear. Political shocks and policy-related risks are the variables to watch, whereas we see recession risk as still moderate.