Menu Our services in the selected location:
  • No services available for your region.
Select Location:
Remember my selection
We have been made aware that there are external parties falsely claiming to carry out financial services on behalf of Goldman Sachs (including Goldman Sachs Asset Management International and Goldman Sachs International) in order to market fake investment products and to solicit monetary payments. These external parties may pose as Goldman Sachs through the use of fraudulent communications via email, instant messaging or phone, as well as through the use of fake brochures and other documents containing Goldman Sachs branding and logos.
The Financial Conduct Authority of UK has issued warnings about these fraudulent activities which can be found here and here.
It is important to know that any communication you receive from Goldman Sachs would only come from an e-mail address and/or be found on the website. Further information regarding how you can protect yourself from fraudulent activity online and how you can contact us about this can be found on the Goldman Sachs Security page, available here.
Your browser is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites

18 November 2020 | GSAM Connect

Portfolio Diversifiers: How Did They Hold Up?

Today’s low rates and high equity valuations have sparked a lively dialogue among investors about developed-market investment grade debt. Is it, many wonder, still an effective hedge against equity risk? Or might other asset classes do a better job?

Many assets that investors typically use to hedge risk were put to the test when the pandemic hit in March. And performance suggests that developed investment grade bonds—the anchor of a core fixed income allocation—passed.

Let’s take a look at what happened. Global equities, as approximated by the MSCI World Index, dropped 13.2% in March. That was their fourth worst monthly performance on record, trailing October 2008 (the Global Financial Crisis), October 1987 (Black Monday) and August 1998 (the Russian Ruble Crisis). But as Exhibit 1 shows, government bonds in the US and UK held up well (though German Bunds were down 0.5%).

EXHIBIT 1: Performance of traditional and non-traditional perceived portfolio hedges in March 2020

Source: Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Bloomberg. As of 3 April 2020. For illustrative purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results, which may vary.

What about other traditional equity hedges? Gold was up just 0.8% in March, likely disappointing many who had relied on it to outperform in periods of market stress. And it wasn’t just gold that struggled. Precious metals more broadly were down 1.4% on the month, while the Japanese yen and Swiss Franc—two currencies that often do well during market pullbacks—were roughly flat. Catastrophe bonds were down 1.8%, while absolute return strategies known as alternative risk premia were down 6%. Cryptocurrencies, speculated to act as an uncorrelated “safe haven” asset class but never previously tested, disappointed, with Bitcoin down 25.7% and Ethereum down 41.5%.

For the purposes of this exercise, we did not include illiquid investments such as property funds, which were mostly gated. After all, a hedge is less valuable if you cannot use it to rebalance into lower equity valuations or cash out if needed.

How should we evaluate the performance of these portfolio diversifiers in the worst month in more than a decade? In our view, a key takeaway is that developed-market, investment grade government bonds performed largely in line with investor expectations, with longer duration fixed income hedging more effectively than shorter duration.

For investors more reticent to hold long duration bonds in their portfolios, trend following strategies were one of the few places to hide. That’s not an anomaly. During the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, trend-following strategies were up during the worst of the equity and real estate drawdowns.

For some investors, it may make sense to complement core bonds with an allocation to absolute return strategies that emphasize trend following. These may provide downside risk benefits without the duration risk of bonds. And with the massive amounts of new government debt being issued, trend following strategies may continue to provide a counterbalance alongside government bonds if we see periods of higher inflation in the future.

Stay posted on the latest market developments and key themes for your portfolios and practices.
Get Connected

Related Insights

Taking Care of Your Portfolio’s Core

This year has shown us that no matter how hard we try, we can’t predict the future. But as rational investors, we should do our best to prepare for it. At GSAM, when it comes to portfolio construction we continuously emphasize preparation over prediction, and preparation has to start by looking at—and taking appropriate care of—your portfolio’s core.

Did Your Core Fixed Income Strategy Weather the Storm?

How can investors build a core strategy that offers consistency and seeks to provide ballast when the sea gets stormy?