This year we have seen rapid repricing of growth and the path of interest rates. The number of market-expected rate hikes increased from three to nine, whereas the consensus estimate for Q1 GDP growth has dropped quickly from nearly 4% to just over 1%, well below the 2.8% per annum rate as highlighted in the Fed’s March Statement of Economic Projections. Communications from the central bank have focused on curbing inflation and a fairly optimistic outlook on the economy.
In the near future, fighting inflation appears as daunting as ever, the result of renewed supply-chain pressures from China and expected food-and-energy shortages tied to the war in Ukraine. In light of these challenges, the Fed’s hawkish stance may be exactly what’s needed to keep inflation expectations anchored. However, the risks of a hard landing and demand destruction would rise if the central bank were to deliver nine rates hikes while simultaneously unwind the balance sheet. Assessing the growth impact of policy tightening requires watching for signs of demand destruction, especially in lower-income brackets.
As measured by the Cyclically-Adjusted Price-to-Earnings ratio, the S&P 500 is trading at a 36.3x multiple. That puts it at the 97th percentile of its historical range—a level last seen in the years leading up to 2000. Therefore, it would not be surprising to see some challenges to equity valuations as interest rates continue to rise, especially in the high-duration sectors. Investors can’t rely on the “Fed put” either; the central bank is not incentivized to provide any further easing of financial conditions given its focus on fighting inflation. If anything, equity selloffs may help to tighten financial conditions in line with the Fed’s objectives.
The mixed signals from recession models, valuations, and the forward-trajectory of policy actions, make this market a very difficult one for making directional calls. Geopolitical risk may complicate things further, as may the mid-term election cycle in the US. History suggests that price action can get more volatile in the second half of a mid-term election year than the first. As such, we will continue to monitor changes in macro fundamentals and price action, and intend to maintain a neutral outlook for now.